How Did the Nuremberg Trials Work and Who Was Tried and Why? Essay

The war crime trials held at Nuremberg are one of the some well(p)-known trials against existence in history. These trials were very tortuous and consisted of m either volume from human beingsy different countries. Justice was a commodious fictional character of these trials and righteousice was served to the stack who were tried and convicted end-to-end this complex process. The specific name for these trials was the internationalist legions Tribunal, often referred to as IMT (Taylor Intro). These were complex trials which sought to trespass new legal ground on study issues of planetary law (Taylor 4).Simply, the Nuremberg trials were created to convict the people who were mingled in the Holocaust and the destruction of Poland as well as other stock-stillts. The events of the Nazi era were a major part of the Nuremberg trials (Taylor 3). These trials were much much mingled than the average somebody would think. It changed the lives of many, many people non nev ertheless were the families of those convicted but of the people who sat in on the hearings were bear upon. Everyone who was remotely involved in these trials was affected by them. But what law was the International armed services Tribunal enforcing? Ordinary courts and trials are based on the statuses of sovereign nations.However, the IMT was no ordinary court. It was established by the United States and three other major European Nations, and the laws by which the IMT was bound were non the laws of those or of any other nations. For its rules on crime the IMT played primarily to the international laws of war, violations were c in bothed war crimes (Taylor 5). Humanitarianism played a self-aggrandizing role in the development of the laws for Nuremberg (Taylor 5). The laws by which the judicatory would follow were not chosen over a days time but, they were well panorama out, reviewed and reviewed again. This was necessary for the simple reason that there would be no way for the charge to beat the organisation because something in the wording was wrong.One of the near historied trials from Nuremberg was that of Goering Hermann Goering. Goering was commander in chief of the air force, devastation chair of the Reichstag, and prime minister of Russia. He was found at fault for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity (Goldensohn 101). It took much more than just taking a look at what Goering did during his time of doing these disastrous things, they looked at his parents, his childhood they took a look at his personal issues. They went deep enough even to look at his past wives (Goldensohn 101). Unlike to the highest degree people convicted by dint ofout the trials Goering was willing to accept that he very did these things. He admitted his wrong doings (Goldensohn 102). unremarkably the convicted would try to fight the system.Goering was a smart man and knew it was easier to accept these things because he knew he did them. G oering was willing to hypothesize he was Hitlers successor he worked face to face with Hitler (Goldensohn 102). That right there could have been enough for the punishment of death. Goering believed that his childhood has no major effect on his pornographic personality, but that his childhood qualities were the same he acquired now he didnt change much. Goerings trial ended in him being sentenced to death by hanging. Two hours before this scheduled execution, on October 15, 1946 he committed suicide in his cellular telephone (Goldensohn 101). Goerings case was one of the more complex and more interesting cases. He understood what was passing game on and didnt fear for his animateness because he knew all of the things he did were wrong.Walther rebound was minister of political economy from 1937 to 1945 (Goldensohn 76). He was tried at Nuremberg. Unlike Goering, Funk feared for his life and would become defensive and teary-eyed when asked close to his political activity. He cla imed he was only a small part of the things that happened and had no idea what was dismission on (Goldensohn 76). Funk did not lead the insalubrious life-style that Goering did but what he did in his adult years was enough to get him into these trials and be convicted. In 1931 he retired from the editorship of the paper, because I felt that the National Socialists were certain(p) to assume power and I was drawn to the movement.Germany was in a crisis. Unemployment was great. Class struggles existed (Goldensohn 77). Funk was never part of the inner circle of Hitler, He was not a politician (he only headed the office for Private work for a few months) (Goldensohn 79). Then average person today in 2011 would think that all the people tried in Nuremberg hated the Jews and were anti-Semitic. Funk was actually a friend with many Jewish people, he worked with Jews he did not hate them (Goldensohn 80). At Nuremberg they accused Funk for the rearmament of Germany. Funk claims that it was false and it was in the work force of Georg Thomas (Goldensohn 81). In the end, on October 1st, 1946 Funk was sentenced to life in prison. He was released in 1957 for health problems and later(prenominal) died in 1960.The Nuremberg trials were different and more complex than most trials. They were held to serve justice. In the end justice was served. The International Military Tribunal was successful in what they cute to accomplish in the first place. These trials are not fully understood by many in particular in the laws that they followed and how the trials were run. Having multiple nations involved and defendants from many nations it became dangerous through translation and things like that. The Nuremberg trials broke the legal ground internationally that it sought to break.Jacklyn Oleksak 3/23/11Works Cited Pd. 2Dodd, Christopher J. Letters from Nuremberg. sore York Crown Publishing, 2007. Print.This book did not help me as much as I thought it would. entitle Letters from Nuremberg it sounded like it would help. After reading mingled pages I noticed it was more of a refreshful of enjoyment rather than a useful re parentage. It was a fairly light re ancestry to understand and the authors credential were very good but I only used a line of twain from the intact book. I got it at the Plainedge Public Library with two other books about the trials.Goldensohn, Leon. The Nuremberg Interviews. New York Alfred A Knopf, 2004. Print.Goldensohn has the trump credentials of all. He was the one interviewing the defendants in his book. Therefore, all his breeding was accurate. The books reliability was very high because it had so much selective information and by checking other sources, it was all correct. It was written a bit above an roaring reading level but I was cap subject to understand it fairly well and get the information I needed. I accessed it at the Public depository library while looking through books for my re chase.Gormley, Larry. Hermann W. Gring. Ehistory memorial. 2001. OSU plane section of history. 17 establish 2011. .This website was fairly helpful. I didnt use it as a primary source but rather as a source to check information. It was helpful in the part of my rise about Goering. It gave me a good oversight of what that split would be about and then I got the more complex details in the Nuremberg Interviews book. I accessed it through advanced search on google.Linder, Doug. The Subsequent Nuremberg Trials An Overview. institution famous trials. 2000. Nuremberg trials. 15 March 2011. This like the Ehistory archives website gave me a great overview of what my paper was going to be about. It was very useful in helping me escort out what was important for my paper and what was not as important. It helped my research become more detailed and it do it a better paper all together. I accessed it in the PHS library from searching on advances search Google.Taylor, Ella. Crimes against humanity. The Village Voice. 29 September- 5 October 2011. ProQuest. PHS library. 22 March 2011. http//proquest.umi.comThis website did not help me at all. It was not as to the point as the other resources I used. It was unnoticeable and unhelpful. It did have some correct information and it was a knowledgeable source but it was not what I needed to write my paper. I accessed it through the PHS databases.Taylor, Telford. The course of the Nuremberg trials. New York Alfred A Knopf, 1992. PrintThis was my most worthful source. It gave me much more than I needed and gave me a variety of information to choose from. It was not an easy reading level to read at. It was most seeming written for well-educated adults but I was able to decipher the information I needed for my research. The information is accurate, I checked through other sources. This was my most helpful guide throughout the research. I accessed it at the Public library.